The Progressive Era - Anti-War

Why do you think you have to seek out obscure websites in order to hear strong antiwar voices? That is an excellent question. I was exploring both Antiwar.com and theamericanconservative.com, and I was asked the question as to why you do not see topics like this in the mainstream media. One explanation would be that accounts that better serve the interests of the majority, or the dominant narrative, are frequently given priority in the media. This occasionally results in the marginalization or underrepresentation of opposing viewpoints, such as those that support the idea of an end to war. Alternative media platforms or obscure websites, like those previously mentioned, could provide a forum where people or groups with opposing ideas can openly express themselves without being censored by conventional editorial agendas. Furthermore, because their opinions are divisive or unpopular, some antiwar voices might not be heard through mainstream channels and instead be found in alternative or fringe contexts. The mainstream media outlets might prioritize certain stories or perspectives while downplaying or ignoring others. This can often be reflected by the biases of their owners or advertisers. This selective reporting will distort the public's perception of events in the world, and limit the diversity of voices heard.

Also, governments throughout history have recognized the power of controlling information and narratives in order to maintain authority and shape public opinion. In many cases, this control extends to what people see and hear through mainstream media channels, and these media sources are regulated as well. A government might censor information that they deem to be sensitive or threatening to their interests. This can involve outright suppression of dissenting voices, manipulation of facts, or even spreading propaganda to influence public perception. 

If sources on anti-war are evident and common in our society, it might even make it harder for the country to declare war if need be. Public criticism of a government, or any individual, is a strong and powerful thing.